Ayodhya: 3-point formula to settle dispute re-emerges

Adjust Comment Print

The clarification has come amid media reports that Salman Nadvi, a member of Board is engaged in an out of court settlement with Hindu Guru Ravishankar.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) may take action against its executive member, Moulana Salman Hasni Nadvi, for supporting the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya. He reiterated that the personal law board stand is that once a Masjid, always a Masjid.

"We strongly believe that the land belonging to a Masjid can not be sold, gifted or donated".

In the meeting, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Muslim Personal Law Board executive member Maulana Syed Salman Hussain Nadvi, Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board chairperson Zufar Ahmad Farooqui Maulana Wasif Hasan of Teelay Wali Masjid in Lucknow and other retired IAS officers were present along with Centre for Objective Research and Development (CORD) director Athar Husain Siddiqui.

Speaking to reports Nadvi had said that the formula he proposed will ensure peace and communal harmony. "A bigger meeting is slated to be held in Ayodhya soon", the statement added.

Referring to various cases in the lower and higher courts across the country, he claimed that the board is taking note of them and pursuing the matter with the utmost judicial conscientiousness.

A special bench heard by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra said it would deal with the case as a "pure land dispute" and clarified that it never meant to hear the case on a "day-to-day basis".

"After 100 years, one particular community could think justice was not done€¦ same issue could be raised again€¦ If this issue has to be resolved forever, the only solution is that a grand temple is constructed with the cooperation of both communities", the Art of Living founder was quoted as saying by The Indian Express in November.

Nvidia shares surge premarket after fourth quarter numbers surprise the market
Och increased its stake in Expedia Inc Del (Call) (EXPE) by 286.61% based on its latest 2017Q3 regulatory filing with the SEC. Average Revenue Estimate of the company for the current Fiscal Quarter is $3.6 Billion, according to consensus of 6 analysts.

The petitions before the judges relate to the 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in the title suit that had been pending for almost six decades.

"After the court order, the Babri Masjid has already been shifted from its original place".

The letter says hand over the disputed site to Hindus and build mosque in Ayodhya on a land that will be made available by the Nirmohi Akhara.

London based World Islamic Forum chairman Maulana Isa Mansuri, Imran Ahmed advocate, and former Haj committee of India chairman A Aboobucker were the other big names who attended this meet.

The mosque was demolished by Hindu Karsevaks on December 6, 1992, in Ayodhya.

On Thursday, the three-judge Supreme Court bench fixed March 14 as the next date of hearing in Ayodhya case as some of the documents and translations were yet to be filed before the apex court.

The Hindus claim that it is the birthplace of Lord Rama where a mosque was built in 1528-29 CE (935 AH) by Mir Baqi.

Without naming anybody, he said that misleading rumors are being circulated, to the effect that some elements are trying to misguide the people on the Babri Masjid issue.